- Operators
- Posts
- 009 AI for Operators
009 AI for Operators
Scott Knowles - founder of Mello, review of Basedash, 9 links
Hi there,
Welcome back to AI for Operators. We’ve got a good one today (or at least that’s what my mom told me), with a demo of a nifty AI sales workflow, AI-powered analytics for your whole team, and some very good links.
Before we dive in, I’ve got a request: feedback! Please tell me what you like about this newsletter, what you wish was different, and anything new that you’d like me to cover. Just hit reply and tell me directly - I promise to respond.
Alright, here’s what we’ve got for you today:
The Operator: Scott Knowles, Founder of Mello
The Review: Basedash, AI-first business analytics
The Links: 9 links, including how teams at Anthropic are using Claude Code, how AI progress will influence your rent, and why your Excel skills may be useless as of today.
The Operator | ![]() |
Scott Knowles, Co-Founder of Mello Scott is the Co-Founder of Mello, a digital process manager that aims to bridge the gap between people-centric automation and AI agents. Previously, he was COO at Hirebook and VP Product at CIENCE. ![]() |
Scott Knowles, Founder of Mello, shares how his n8n-plus-GPT-4 workflow writes, personalizes, and tracks cold outreach. Useful for operators who want to scale sales, recruiting, or cold outreach for some other purpose without extra headcount:
Personalization at scale: Scott uses n8n to enrich each prospect’s record, feeds it to GPT-4, and then drafts tailored cold emails - no code required.
Results are solid: 2x higher reply rate than static templates while performing on par with fully manual emails.
Cost rounds to $0: self-hosted n8n, $12 Google Workspace, and negligible GPT-4 tokens means you’re essentially getting a free SDR.
Safe send limits are baked in: he throttles the system to 5-10 new sequences per weekday to stay on the right side of Google.
CRM sync and sentiment-ready: the flow flags replies, updates the sheet, and can layer LLM sentiment scoring or auto-responses for deeper automation.
Widely applicable: Trying to getting users for your product? Want to increase sales? Building an advisory board? Recruiting engineers? Inviting people to an event? Cold outreach is valuable no matter what your company needs, so you should at least experiment with trying to improve it.
Company-wide takeaway: document repeated workflows (whether software- or people-based), so you can turn them into scalable processes with AI.

The Review | ![]() |
This is not a sponsored post, though Basedash has sponsored Chief of Staff Network once previously.
What It Does
Basedash turns your production databases and SaaS data into a keyboard-fast, AI-powered workspace for querying, editing, and visualizing information. Connect Postgres, MySQL, or 500+ cloud apps, and it auto-generates a spreadsheet-like UI plus a ClickHouse warehouse. Non-technical teammates ask questions in plain English; Basedash translates them into SQL, builds dashboards, and suggests follow-up insights. Engineers still get a full SQL editor, version history, and custom actions to trigger external APIs. Everything is permissioned, audited, and SOC 2 certified, with optional on-prem deployment.
Why Ops Leaders Should Care
Ops leaders live on accurate, timely data. Basedash removes the wait on engineers by giving every teammate safe, self-serve access to live production information and AI-driven analysis. You centralize admin tasks, ad-hoc metrics, and dashboards in one tool, cut custom internal-tool build time, and keep a provable audit trail for compliance—no extra headcount or piecemeal BI stack required.
Key Features (Pros & Cons)
Pros
Instant spreadsheet-like UI from any SQL database or 550+ SaaS connectors.
Conversational AI converts plain English to SQL and auto-builds charts.
Unified platform for CRUD actions, dashboards, and warehouse—no context switching.
Granular roles, edit history, and SOC 2 compliance bolster data governance.
Snappy 60fps UX with keyboard shortcuts delights daily power users.
Cons
$999/month flat price deters very small teams.
Limited to Basedash’s opinionated layouts; complex custom UIs need other tools.
Advanced analytics depth trails Looker, Tableau, or dedicated data-modeling suites.
An Operator’s Perspective

Connecting data sources in Basedash
I took advantage of Basedash’s 14-day free trial offer to test out the tool.
I started out using the fake data sets that Basedash provides for testing and was able to generate some analyses with natural language prompts. However, the data sets are limited, so I decided to connect one of our core company accounts to try it out in more of a ‘live fire’ capacity.
The first thing that I noticed was that the system was slow - it took roughly 12 hours for the data to sync to Basedash. While this ultimately isn’t a big deal, it prevented me from really sinking my teeth into the tool when I was most excited to do so.
The next morning when I finally got access to the data, it was a somewhat different story. I created a couple of analyses using live transactional data and it performed quickly and successfully. Creating a chart from that data on the fly was less successful. The prompting is straightforward and powerful - I’m not skilled at SQL, so being able to generate analyses just by describing the outcome I wanted felt slightly magical. Basedash also has a full SQL editor for more technical users.

Basedash shows its work while it generates a chart from a simple natural language query
The “Reports” functionality was also intriguing. It comes preset with a bunch of suggestions, including generating investor updates, notable signups, and more (screenshot below). These kinds of features are thoughtful - they help overcome the ‘cold start’ problem of most analytics tools and improve time to value for busy ops professionals. Reporting can be updated on a set cadence and can even be sent out via Slack. Imagine automating a bunch of your reporting - sounds pretty good to me.

Some of the suggested reports you can generate out of the box
Navigation is intuitive for the beginner, but seems to be quite powerful for those with more experience with the system. Navigation is fast and can be done entirely from the keyboard (no mouse needed). The data privacy/security of the tool was sufficient from my perspective, as were the access controls (you can control access at the data set level, report level, dashboard level, etc.
Since I only connected a single database/tool, I wasn’t able to see firsthand the full power of the system, but I can see how useful it would be if it had access to every one of your organization’s key systems.
Other Options

Bottom Line
From this operator’s perspective, Basedash seems quite compelling for mid-sized or high-growth companies who don’t want to invest in a full Tablau/Power BI/etc. build-out yet. For those at larger companies who need more enterprise features, or folks who are more opinionated on data definitions, display, etc., it may not be the right fit.
The Links | ![]() |
Note: I’ve reversed the order of these sections to put Practical at the top, since giving you actionable takeaways is the mission of AI for Operators.
Practical
Figma’s human-centered approach to AI: Befitting their design roots, the company outlines the thoughtful process behind their roll-out of AI tools, focusing on the creation of their evals.
How teams at Anthropic use Claude Code: A useful overview of use cases for teams from inference to legal to growth marketing
Perspectives
Power is the bottleneck for AI: This report from Goldman describes the limiting factors and implications of the $5T (yes, with a T) of energy investment needed to power the AI revolution.
Scaling conversations: A wonky academic presentation demonstrates two main things: 1) rethinking your work from the bottom up is compulsory if you want to get the most out of AI, 2) attention will become an even more valuable commodity as AI creates the ability to scale requests for attention near infinitely (think: AI-generated content, AI SDRs, etc.)
Dwarkesh and Auren Hoffman on AI (and more): AI timelines, why increasing model capabilities doesn’t necessarily lead to higher productivity, and more.
Measuring AI progress by the price of rent: Tyler Cowen makes the case that AI will not lower prices for the largest components of the consumption basket (housing, food, education), except for maybe health.
AI Market Clarity: The top solo VC makes the case that many of the key markets in the AI landscape have crystalized, showing who the winners and losers will be.
News
AI Action Plan: This assessment of the US government’s big new plan from commentator Zvi Mowshowitz is comprehensive and readable.
No more crushing Excel? Shortcut, which claims to beat first year analyst from McKinsey and Goldman 89% of the time (as judged by their managers), launched with

Thanks for reading,
Tom Guthrie