004 AI for Operators

Chief of Staff at LaunchDarkly, review of Glean, 6 links

Hi there, 

Welcome back to AI for Operators!

This week, here’s what we’ve got:

  • The Operator: Abhishek Vora, Chief of Staff at LaunchDarkly

  • The Review: Glean: AI assistants and agents built on your company’s knowledge

  • The Links: 6 articles, including a potential Apple acquisition, conflicting reports on increasing AI spend in the enterprise vs. unsuccessful pilot programs, and a lawsuit with big potential implications for data privacy.

The Operator

Abhishek Vora, Chief of Staff at LaunchDarkly

Abhishek serves as the Chief of Staff to the CEO at LaunchDarkly. Previously, he was Head of Strategy & VP Customer Success at Mosaic.tech and VP GTM Strategy & Operations at Quid.

Abhishek uses AI extensively in his role. In this episode, he walks through several valuable workflows and concepts, including:

  • How he chains multiple prompts across ChatGPT Gemini Deep Research to keep track of competitors, work that would take an intern days

  • Drafting CEO updates, all-hands scripts, and memos in ChatGPT, which lets him focus on the narrative

  • M&A: he uses ChatGPT to keep tabs on potential acquisition targets

  • Gemini flagged a new feature as half-baked, which set the team off on a hunt to discover the underlying issues - and solve them

  • The ascendance of operators: how AI empowers generalist operators to tackle contracts, real-estate leases, and product positioning without calling in specialists

The Review

This is not a sponsored post.

What It Does

Glean is a “Work AI” platform that combines enterprise search with an AI assistant and automation agents. It connects to your company’s apps and databases to index all your internal knowledge (documents, messages, wikis, etc.) in one place, while enforcing permissions so employees only see what they should. Employees can ask natural-language questions and Glean’s assistant uses LLMs to retrieve answers, draft content, or orchestrate workflows based on your internal knowledge graph.

Why Ops Leaders Should Care

How much time do you and your team spend hunting through old presentations, sifting through spreadsheets, or pinging random colleagues to gather information? Glean makes data from HR, finance, sales, IT and other departments instantly searchable in a single interface. By scaling context across the organization and reducing busywork, Glean can free ops leaders to focus on higher-value projects instead of chasing information.

A picture of Glean’s dashboard

Key Features (Pros & Cons)

Pros:

  • Unified search across 100+ workplace apps

  • An AI chat assistant that can surface answers or draft documents based on your company’s knowledge

  • AI agents that can analyze data and automate common processes, accompanied by the business context to make those automations smart

  • Strong attention to security and permissions

  • Robust fundraising history - a $7.2 billion valuation with $610 million raised since early 2024 (including a fresh $150 million this month in their Series F)

Cons

  • Onboarding takes real time and effort - connecting and indexing all the data sources needed to make it useful doesn’t happen instantly

  • Giving any tool such extensive access to your internal data presents security and compliance risks - while Glean places an emphasis on security, it’s a young, fast-growing company

  • Lack of transparent pricing (and the actual pricing is not cheap - think $30-50 per user per month)

  • Questions about sustainability of data accessibility: Slack - one of many companies’ key data repositories - severely restricted access to its system for many outside service providers, a trend likely to continue as b2b tools try to protect their competitive advantage by locking down their data

An Operator’s Perspective

A senior operator at a growth-stage tech company who asked to remain anonymous gave the following report on their company’s usage of Glean:

What they were looking for: “An enterprise solution that would work across multiple tools…one of our largest issues was employees finding data across the business.”

Who “owns” the system? “Our IT department, which sits under finance and operations.”

What do you like about it? “The search functionality is strong, it can read across multiple tools and provide summaries…one of the agents built [us] a weekly summary report which is used by teams to highlight what has and hasn’t moved over the week…[the agents] are pretty simple to use so we’re starting to see adoption across the business.”

ROI so far: “We’ve seen reduction in manual processes and search times.”

Critical feedback:

  • “It runs behind live ChatGPT by about 6 months, so the responses you receive are often better in ChatGPT vs Glean.”

  • “It’s only as good as the data in your company…if you’re not keeping documentation up to date” then it doesn’t work as well.

  • “The recent announcement from Salesforce around cutting off API access is an issue. Slack is our main communication tool and not being able to access this data ultimately removes the usefulness of the tool.”

Overall

Public commenters outline the common trade-offs in build vs. buy in this use case - Glean’s UI is great and it generally works well after the initial setup, but it’s expensive and less flexible than building it yourself. A 4.8/5 on G2 and general lack of negative sentiment to be found online point to the fact that it’s solving a real set of problems for companies. However, it’s only as useful as the quality of its inputs and headwinds on access to outside tools like Slack could prove to be a real problem.

Other Options

Bottom Line

Today: if you’ve got a pretty standard tech stack, a complex or fast-growing org, and at least moderately-good data hygiene, Glean (or a tool like it) can help make your team more efficient.

Tomorrow: as assistants and agents become more powerful, a system like Glean could be table stakes for any company that wants to deploy an agentic workforce. Connections to outside tools are quickly becoming a battlefield, as companies pursue different competitive strategies, so adjusting to shifting permissions is likely to become the norm. Meanwhile, the AI giants with built-in access to your data (from Google and Microsoft to OpenAI) aren’t slowing down…

The Links

  • Apple in talks to acquire Perplexity: Lagging behind its megacap peers, Apple seems to be casting about for its next move. It has plenty of cash and valuable stock. The questions are: is this real? Will Perplexity sell? What will the number be? And is it too little too late?

  • 72% of enterprises planning to increase GenAI spending: My main question - what’s wrong with the other 28%?

  • The AI trough of disillusionment? Lots of companies have bought into the AI hype. With actual dollars deployed and proofs of concept in the field, how many of them will be deemed failures, setting AI adoption back meaningfully at these companies? Apparently, the number of companies scrapping their pilots has spiked from 17% to 42%

  • “The 2020s are about software absorbing expertise” VC Brittany Walker discusses how prompts are becoming the new programs and how software workflows will steer employees to perform more effectively.

  • AI usage doubles since 2023: But, the usage isn’t evenly distributed. White collar workers are the ones adopting AI, while blue collar workers’ adoption rates haven’t increased.

  • NYTimes vs. OpenAI: The legal showdown continues to advance, with the NYTimes asking the court to force OpenAI to retain all ChatGPT and API data going forward. OpenAI has appealed the order, citing trust and privacy concerns. For companies using ChatGPT or OpenAI’s API, this is worth tracking.

Thanks for reading,

Tom Guthrie

If you liked this edition of AI for Operators, share it with another operator you know!